Advertisement
No to NBAF reaction
Not everyone in Manhattan is happy with the decision to place the National Bio and Agro-defense Facility in the Little Apple.
"I was very disappointed they picked Manhattan to have this facility," cattle farmer Paul Irvine said.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has recommended building the $450 million National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility on the Kansas State University campus.
Paul Irvine's farm is two miles from the site where NBAF will be built.
Reader poll
Do you support the decision to make Manhattan the site for America's new biodefense facility?
- Yes, it will boost the local economy 35% 35 votes
- Yes, it will be a source of pride for Kansans 14% 14 votes
- No, it will put Kansas at risk for an agroterrorist attack 8% 8 votes
- No, it has the potential to put our health and safety at risk 35% 35 votes
- No opinion 6% 6 votes
98 total votes.
"We are worried about our own cattle, yes we are," Irvine said.
He's worried that an outbreak will harm his livestock and maybe even his livelihood.
"If there was an accidental release, it could spread very rapidly and there would be a lot of economic damage," Irvine said, "a lot more damage by that then there would be the economic benefit they say will come from this facility."
The outbreak wouldn't just affect the town of Manhattan.
"I just think that if there was an outbreak of foot and mouth disease that our exports would be ruined."
Irvine is part of a group called No NBAF in Kansas, which worries about the safety of the facility.
He says they can build a secure facility, do all the employee testing and screenings they want, but there's one thing they can't prevent
"Human error, it just happens," Irvine said.
Irvine says he would rather the facility stay on Plum Island, "because I really don't think this facility should be in the middle of cattle country."
The group plans on writing letters to president-elect Barack Obama and his administration about their concerns.
- Homeland Security: Manhattan gets NBAF officially (12-12-08)
- NBAF moving to Manhattan (12-04-08)
- NBAF location worries some farmers (12-04-08)
- Homeland Security recommends Manhattan for NBAF (12-03-08)
- Bio-defense lab defended (08-20-08)
- Opposition groups to NBAF speaking out (08-19-08)
- K-State speaks out on its NBAF eligibility 08-12-08)
- NBAF Update: Mississippi receives Homeland Security endorsement (08-11-08)
- NBAF request has governor rattled (03-14-08)
- NBAF Task Force: Kansas can protect the American people (02-22-07)
More like this
- Kansas officials say NBAF lawsuit won't be a distraction April 22, 2009
- NBAF funding cut from bill June 26, 2009
- State leaders say NBAF is necessary to protect national security October 27, 2009
- Government report says NBAF in Kansas not safe July 27, 2009
- Opposition groups to NBAF speaking out 10 comments / August 19, 2008
Comments
Save_PIADC (anonymous) says...
God Bless Paul Irvine!
He is courageous for speaking out and questioning the propaganda being foisted on an unwitting public by Tom Thornton - the head of the Kansas Bioscience Authority. Thornton is a layman with no agricultural background or Kansas roots and a preexisting relationship with Jay Cohen - the DHS Undersecretary for Science & Technology and the "decision authority" for building NBAF.
The fact of the matter is that the risk analysis for building NBAF in Kansas and bringing live-virus FMD research to the US mainland has not been sufficiently conducted. The GAO has found DHS' risk analysis wanting.
For starters, in 2002 the USDA (the real government agricultural experts) estimated that an FMD outbreak in the US would cost our economy ranging from $10-$30 billion. Curiously, in its EIS, DHS estimated that an accidental FMD release from a Kansas NBAF would cost only $4.2 billion in economic losses. How do we reconcile these numbers?
Simply put, the NBAF site selection process has been flawed and deeply politicized. The following document challenging the EIS and NBAF selection process chronicles these fatal flaws:
http://documents.scribd.com/docs/bs61...
December 4, 2008 at 10 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )