Advertisement
Merger Concerns
Concerns about a plan to merge the city and county recreation departments are keeping it from moving forward.
City Council member Karen Hiller says it should be another year before the city and county merge their parks and recreation departments.
"We need to do it right," she said. "People really do want to have excellent services they can compare what city and county are doing right, but to save money they need to see it and that's not been on the table."
County Commissioner Vic Miller disagrees.
At a special meeting between both sides Monday night, he says the city first has to decide to do the merger, before savings will ever happen.
"I happen to know for they'll be money saved," he said. "As far as putting an amount on it, what difference does it make if it's a dollar of 20 million? It'll be less that what we're paying now."
The county's merger proposal includes pools, community centers, the Helen Hocker theatre and parks.
But 70 of the city's small parks, those that are two acres or less, are left out and it would be up to the city to take care of them.
It's an idea Topeka Parks and Recreation director Terry Bertels doesn't agree with.
"I think they should be included because they're important to those people in that neighborhood," Bertels said. "If there's going to be consolidation, let's consolidate and lets include everything regardless of size."
We asked all parties involved if they're leaning one way or another on the county's proposal.
"I think we don't have a plan," Hiller said.
"I don't get a vote so I don't know," Bertels said.
"I don't expect it to be passed until it ever does," Miller said.
The proposal also says the merger would be under county control.
Councilman John Alacla says the city needs to make a decision by July 1st.
More like this
- Shawnee County Parks and Recreation and Topeka Parks and Recreation could be merging April 16, 2009
- Meeting set to discuss City and County Parks and Rec merger May 15, 2009
- Information technology merger still has hurdles to clear December 18, 2006
- Pond accident raises safety issues February 21, 2006
- City, state and county officials meet to discuss forestry disposal fire June 14, 2006

Comments
WCBA (anonymous) says...
I am not from your area, and in essence have no dog in this fight, For over 40 years I have been a manager, planner and consultant to State, County and local parks and recreation Departments across the nation. I do not know the particulars or merits of the proposed merger between county and city departments. I do know that the 70, less than two-acre neighborhood parks, if maintained properly, are among the costliest pieces of parkland. Because of the staffing, travel, trailering of equipment, and size of equipment needed to maintain these small-parcel parks they can cost as much as maintaining the other parklands (not including facilities) combined. If I were representing the City I would not make this deal without the inclusion of those 70 parks.
May 27, 2009 at 4:05 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )