Advertisement
Smoking ban sees Topekans speaking up
Topekans are stating their case for or against a city-wide smoking ban to the city council at a forum Monday night.
Topekans are stating their case for or against a city-wide smoking ban to the city council at a forum Monday night.
The hearing starts at 5:30 p.m. and what the community has to say could determine how council members vote Tuesday night.
Reader poll
Do you support a smoking ban in Topeka?
- Yes 54% 173 votes
- No 45% 143 votes
316 total votes.
"Recognize your responsibilities and go with the health of your contingencies and vote the way 80 percent of your people want you to vote," says Allan Thomas. Thomas supports the ban.
"It's the appearance of some members of the council are attempting to micro-manage how business is conducted in Topeka," says Andrew Gray, a resident against the ban.
Council member Karen Hiller says what Gray suggests is not the case.
She says the issue of a smoking ban comes down to three categories: public and individual health, rights of business owners and individuals, and economic development.
Hiller says, "For me you also look at, well if there's somebody's rights who'll be changed by this, is there some way we can soften that blow?"
She also says the ordinance allows every business to have outdoor smoking space, but in the end the goal is to do what's best for the community.
And as the public discussion comes to a close, Hiller says it's time for the council to vote.
"Are you afraid the council will make a wrong decision? I hope not. I mean we have to make the best decision we can as long as everyone that's voting is taking the time to be fully informed," says Hiller.
The council decides on the ban at their 6 p.m. meeting, Tuesday, Sept. 29. If they pass the ordinance, the ban goes into effect in 60 days. Topekans will have one last chance to speak about the smoking ban tomorrow night during the city council meeting.
Read the full agenda at http://public.agenda.topeka.org. The smoking ban can be found under section 5B.
More like this
- Topeka city council approves smoking ban 7 comments / September 29, 2009
- Topekans are stating their case for or against a city-wide smoking ban to the city council at a foru September 28, 2009
- Public hearings set for proposed smoking ban 1 comment / September 14, 2009
- Forum answers public questions about smoking ban 2 comments / October 30, 2008
- Manhattan City Commission discussing smoking ban August 22, 2006


Comments
generalsn (anonymous) says...
Just a reminder of the sources of the bans, RWJ Foundation, owned by big pharma, and the coalitions, more concerned with "social change" than the bans themselves:
http://www.rwjf.org/pr/product.jsp?ia...
And what the 99 million dollars was going to. Note on page seven the "inside -out", provision going for patios later, AFTER business owners spend thousands of dollars to build them to accommodate their smoking customers, clearly showing that the tobacco control activists have ABSOLUTLY NO CONCERN about local issues or businesses.
http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/CIA_Funda...
Here's the "model ban" from page eight that many communities copied, printed, and passed. It's the "smoking ban for dummies" It only takes a few minutes to fill in the blanks naming your community, the administrators names, and blanks to customize it to your community according to the width of your sidewalks.
http://www.no-smoke.org/document.php?...
September 28, 2009 at 5:42 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
MichaelJMcFadden (anonymous) says...
.
To see just how the nonsense pro-ban statistics like those fed to the Council get made up and WHY they get made up just check these four links:
.
http://www.jacobgrier.com/blog/archiv...
.
shows how researchers promise the "right" answers to the ban funders before even doing the research and how they juggle the numbers to create those "right" answers even when they don't exist.
.
http://www.velvetgloveironfist.com/in...
.
shows how the nonsense 14% number was produced for Scotland: a good example of what's been done in all these "instant heart attack cure" studies.
.
And if you go to the granddaddy of all these studies, the "Great Helena Heart Miracle," and read the BMJ's official RR's at:
.
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/bmj.3...
.
and
.
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/bmj.3...
.
you'll see how the "evidence" of what they did was erased from the net and needed to be resurrected through an archival service. The absolutely amazing thing is that the thoroughly discredited "bounce-back" claim is STILL being used today, five years later, and the media is STILL printing it. See last week's Wall St. Journal at:
.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001...
.
where the claim is repeated in the next to last paragraph! Smoking bans are based on lies, pure and simple... if you take the time to look at them.
.
Michael J. McFadden
Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"
September 28, 2009 at 11:40 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )